| A colony by any other name |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, 30 November 1999 00:00 | |
|
If
it wasn’t obvious already, the US is now the official occupier of Iraq.
On May 22, the United Nations (UN) Security Council approved – by a 14-0
vote – a resolution giving the US and its sidekick Britain the authority
to occupy and “rebuild†Iraq. So
much for Germany, France and Russia’s opposition to the US-led invasion
a few months ago. “The war has taken place,†French Foreign Minister
Dominique de Villepin told France Inter radio. “Now it’s time to
restore the unity of the international community.†In reality, European
leaders are trying to “restore†their hands on some of the loot from
post-war Iraq – and the price for that was throwing their support behind
a resolution that gives UN blessing to the new US oil colony. A
major point of the resolution was the lifting of economic sanctions, which
were imposed on Iraq 13 years ago after Saddam Hussein’s regime invaded
Kuwait. Over the last decade, the embargo destroyed what was left of
Iraq’s infrastructure after the 1991 Gulf War’s punishing air
campaign. Activists around the world fought long and hard for ending the
deadly sanctions. But
it was pure hypocrisy for some Security Council members to spout their
“concern†for the Iraqi people as a justification for backing the
resolution. “[W]e cannot undo history,†said German ambassador Gunter
Pleuger. “We are now in the situation where we have to take action for
the sake of the Iraqi people.†What
a fraud! The suffering of the Iraqi people didn’t matter to the war
makers in Washington until they wanted to exploit Iraq’s oil wealth, and
it didn’t matter to other world leaders either – until it seemed that
they might be cut out after the US takeover. When news of the end of
sanctions reached Basra on May 20, residents celebrated, according to Alex
Renton, of the aid group Oxfam. But
there’s more to the story. That same day, “doctors and nurses
demonstrated at the United Nations and at the British military base,â€
Renton wrote in Scotland’s Sunday
Herald. “Their banner read: ‘Restore security, water and
electricity, or all the doctors and nurses will go on strike.’†Judging
from the occupation so far, the last thing that the US government should
be in charge of is the future of the Iraqi people. Hospitals are still in
chaos, and food and clean water are scarce. Yet the US government, with
all its vast resources, hasn’t lifted a finger. With
the country plagued by poverty and hunger, conditions are ripe for looting
and violence. And the worst gang by far is the US military. In
April, in the city of Falluja, west of Baghdad, US troops fired on
anti-occupation demonstrators twice in one week, killing at least 15
people. Then in late May US troops were at it again in Falluja, firing
tank shells indiscriminately around the city and forcing their way into
people’s homes after US soldiers were fired on. “They went crazy, they
fired everywhere,†Safi Jaber told Reuters. In
the oil-rich city of Kirkuk in northern Iraq, residents got an idea of
what Washington means by “democracy†during local elections. “In
preparation for the vote, US forces surrounded the city hall with tanks
and spools of barbed wire,†the Washington
Post reported. “Iraqis whitewashed the building, hung up red, white
and blue bunting – and then took it down, because those are not the
colours of the Iraqi flag. “And when Major Gen. Ray Odierno entered the
torpid auditorium, the delegates were instructed to stand.†From
the delegates who voted to the candidates they voted for, the US called
the shots “We know who is running the show,†one attendee told the Post.
Just to underline the point, US officials announced that they were
pushing back the timetable for Iraqi self-rule. “We are talking about
sometime in July,†said Washington’s top dog, chief administrator Paul
Bremer, who chose to make this his first order after the UN resolution
sanctioning the occupation was passed. This
is what the United Nations is fronting for – a US occupation in which
all opposition is met with an iron fist. Washington won’t leave Iraq
until it has imposed its puppets and exploited the country’s oil
resources – unless it’s forced out. That’s why we oppose the US
occupation of Iraq – with or without UN permission. |
Login



