| The war at home |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, 30 November 1999 00:00 | |
|
Labour and the Alliance\'s attack on civil liberties Dougal McNeill
There
have only been two "terrorist" attacks in New Zealand in the
past 50 years. One was carried out by the secret service of a supposedly
friendly state (France), the other the still unsolved 1984 Wellington
Trades Hall bombing is widely suspected to have been the work of a
right-wing nut. Surely New Zealand must be one of the "safest"
countries in the world? (The Taleban, as we pointed out in our last
issue, don't even know where this country is!)
The
Labour/Alliance coalition have lost no time in using the US "War on
Terror" as an excuse to attack democratic rights and beef up state
powers at home whilst cosying up to the US regime. In a series of
government press releases in late January it was revealed that over the
next three years $29 million worth of funding for
"anti-terrorist" activities is to be given to eight different
government agencies. Over $11 million of this is to go to agencies
dedicated to internal spying - the Security Intelligence Services (SIS)
and GCSB.
Illegal
surveillance
It has
been well documented in the past that the SIS has carried out illegal
surveillance and spying activities against protest and activist groups
in New Zealand. The very same government that can't find the money to
fund the claims of nurses and teachers is now somehow
"discovering" $29 million to give to the SIS, the racist cops,
customs and others! This is still more proof for workers, students,
women, Mäori and all of us who are exploited by this rotten system that
we can't put our faith in parliament and Labour and the Alliance. In the
end their commitments are the same as National's: to spy on and attack
democratic dissent in Aotearoa and to stay in the US's good books.
Jim
Anderton made this point explicitly in a recent press release: "the
Labour/Alliance coalition is planning some changes to legislation to
provide more flexibility in sharing information with overseas law
enforcement agencies." The CIA, one of America's most notorious
"law enforcement agencies" has a long and bloody record of
illegally involving itself in the suppression of dissident groups in
South America, as well as funding and training right wing death squads
for dictatorships like that of Pinochet in Chile.
"Terrorists"
For
decades Nelson Mandela and the ANC were denounced as
"terrorists" by the same people. In 1981 members of Muldoon's
National Government described the anti-Springbok tour movement as
"terrorist." Far from being in a position to lead a "war on
terror," the United States is probably the worst terrorist state the
modern world has known, as even a brief look at its history of
assassinations, wars and support for bloodthirsty dictators would show.
And yet Anderton and Clark seem all too keen to change the law to keep
New Zealand on-side! A "war on terror" means a war on the
democratic rights of Aotearoa's workers.
This war
on democratic rights at home has already begun. At the first meeting of
the Anti-Imperialist Coalition - a coalition of groups who oppose New
Zealand's support for the US "war on terror" - two uniformed
cops visited the meeting, wanting to find out about the coalition's
members and planned activities. In early November the Pathfinder Press
bookshop in Christchurch received phone calls and a visit from
Christchurch Central Police Station's Paul O'Neill to convey
"concern" about the "anti-American character" of the
bookshop's window display.
The
shop's display included anti-war and anti-imperialist slogans as well as
an anti-war editorial. The cop timed his visit to coincide with a forum
about New Zealand's role in the war being held at the bookstore. In
Wellington early this year a man, Tahir Ali, was visited by the cops
after writing a letter to The
Evening Post suggesting that the
SAS be disbanded because it was a waste of taxpayers' money. The
detective who spoke to Mr Ali told him that the police routinely
investigated people who expressed opinions against the government. After
they came under widespread criticism, the police claimed that they had
investigated Mr Ali because he had an "Arab sounding name" (he
is in fact a Fijian Indian who has lived in this country since he was an
infant).
Erode
freedoms
None of
these three blatant attacks on free speech were in response to formal
complaints. Anyway, since when has writing a letter to the editor been a
crime? Instead, they are part of a concerted effort on the part of the
government and the cops to challenge and erode our democratic freedoms.
The "war on terror" has provided the perfect opportunity for
Labour and the Alliance to try and strengthen the power of the ruling
class. The Terrorism Suppression Bill was already before parliament
early last year. September 11 and its aftermath has given the government
the confidence to go that bit further.
All of
these events highlight a difference between revolutionaries like those
of us in the International Socialist Organisation and those reformist
parties - like the Greens and the Alliance - who see parliament as the
"democratic" way for workers to win change. The state and
parliament are not institutions that can be reformed or relied on to be
neutral bodies in struggles between workers and their rulers. They are
organs of class power - the power of the ruling class over the rest of
us.
As the
great German revolutionary Rosa Luxemburg put it, "what
parliamentarism expresses is capitalist society, that is to say, a
society in which capitalist interests predominate. In this society, the
representative institutions, democratic in form, are in content the
instruments of the interests of the ruling class." Those police who try
and intimidate dissenting groups are not just examples of "bad cops,"
although we should certainly protest their actions: they represent the
logic of a system that needs an body like the cops to keep up the rule
of the rich. And, even if they wanted to, Labour and the Alliance are in
no position to challenge the world ruling class decision to launch an
imperialist offensive - as George W. Bush himself made clear,
governments are either with America or against it.
Again,
Rosa Luxemburg anticipated much of this: "as soon as democracy
shows the tendency to negate its class character and become transformed
into an instrument of the real interests of the population, the
democratic forms are sacrificed by the bourgeoisie and by its state
representatives." The focus by the cops on anti-war activists and
socialists is just a small taste of what we can expect from the ruling
class in the form of attacks on workers if this conflict escalates.
Logic
of the system
This is
why slogans like "Justice Not Revenge" and calls for an
international tribunal are misguided and doomed to failure. The
Coalition's attacks on democratic rights are not some sort of
aberration, they are part of the logic of this undemocratic system. We
cannot rely on those who at the moment attack civil liberties to bring
neutral "justice." To begin the movement against this war and to
protect our freedoms we need to use them - to get out in the streets
protesting, distributing dissenting pamphlets and leaflets and
organising.
We need
to organise in the unions to show to our workmates how attacks on
democratic rights are attacks on workers' rights. Because, if we don't
take on the Labour/Alliance government and fight against their attacks
on democracy then we will give the ruling class the confidence to
increase their assault. The history of this country proves how far they
are prepared to go - check out the article on the 1951 lockout (when
censors controlled all press) in Issue 7 of this magazine if you want
proof.
New
Cold War?
There is
nothing George W. and his obedient allies in Wellington would like more
than a new Cold War with "terrorism" standing in for
"communism." But those who pessimistically assume this to be
inevitable ignore the vastly different situation now than 50 years ago.
Today there is enormous bitterness at two decades of declining living
standards and attacks on social services. Ordinary people's trust in
governments and institutions is far weaker than it was then.
We know
the nightmare scenario the Bush gang wants to repeat. We need to
organise to make sure they can't do it again.
|
Login



