| Identity politics |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, 30 November 1999 00:00 | |
|
Commodification is not liberation! J.P. Ryan
The
history of oppression is lengthy and extremely varied in form, style,
and content. That much is clear. Our understanding of oppression in our
everyday lives, and where this comes from, is perhaps less obvious to
many. Consider the experience of "queer" individuals in
contemporary Aotearoa. I give it the qualification "queer"
because the word needs be recognised for what it is: a random identity,
a created term. We could equally easily speak of gay, or same gender
oriented persons, to use any one of several prejudiced and inadequate
ruling class labels. Identity politics are problematic precisely because
they make sexuality a person's primary social affiliation, rather than
asking the questions of what you do, where you do it, and who tells you
to do it (if anyone).
This
isn't to suggest that sex is apolitical, but rather that the situations
surrounding it are much more complex. As revolutionaries involved in the
fight against hatred we see the liberation movement as central to the
wider political struggle. More importantly, ours is a significant and
increasingly vocal element, both as activists and as ex-victims. Queers
have been stigmatised, marginalised, and more often than not made the
victims of violence, whether it's committed directly, or indirectly
through the socialised language of aggressive capitalist ideology.
What
constitutes this process? In the first place, it's derived from the
sense of isolation capitalism engenders and thrives on. As theory, it's
summed up nicely in Marx's understanding of alienation which states that
organised capital oppresses communities and individuals by separating
them from direct ownership of the means of production. In practice, the
atomisation and competition that results from this sets people at each
other's throats, in all kinds of different ways (just take a good look
around you next time you're downtown).
At the
same time, the exploitative nature of the system means people are
evaluated only according to their productive potential, or labour value.
In terms of sex and gender, this makes you cannon fodder, or cheap
labour, or a captive market of consumers, and probably all three. In
other words, who you fuck (and how you do it) is an important issue for
the capitalist class, because it's a tangible, material matter that's
going to affect profit margins, sooner or later.
How do
they control the wildcard of human sexuality? By demonising sexuality
through religion and through the conscious promotion of images of
"appropriate" gender-determined behaviour, or by giving us
preordained images of "queerness" - the camp, weak, pet-gay of
women's shows or the "butch" mannish lesbian. These are false
and insulting stereotypes, and are only a few of the more common methods
of social manipulation. Sounding self-indulgent? Well, not really - the
way in which similar aspects of capitalist ideology have been used to
specifically oppress women has been observed and fought against since
the first days of the revolutionary socialist movement.
Its
significance for queers is perhaps more recent, which is partly due to
the relatively low profile of the liberation struggle. At the same time,
a truly materialist critique that explains the nature of this oppression
doesn't feature prominently in contemporary queer activism. Tendencies
to "assimilate" (whatever that means) can't really tackle the
subject, because in the end they don't ask the right questions, and they
too readily accept the existing order as basically valid. The assumption
made is that homophobia simply rises out of a cultural perspective
(whatever one of those looks like) and fails to describe social
conditions and the manner in which environment determines consciousness.
As for
my ability to co-exist in any legal sense (coming down to property!) -
so what if a bunch of asset-mining, blandly reformist liberals can draft
a piece of legislation (to be passed and protected by racist, sexist
institutions like Parliament and the courts) informing us of our right
to love whoever we choose (and congratulate themselves about it?) Who
the fuck are they to claim to guard my freedom while in the same breath
upholding the right of corporations to screw over workers, rape the
environment, and lust for American dollars? It takes an essentially
vicious State to bring about one of the highest incidents of youth
suicide in the world. This kind of harvest isn't an accident, and it
isn't a situation that your local white male in Parliament is capable of
solving. It's going to take a lot more to end the violence and the
sadness perpetuated by the obscenity that is capitalism.
"Tolerance"
campaigns and staying silent for a day have clearly failed miserably as
tactics in the struggle to liberate Aotearoa's lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgendered communities. Despite the ability of "Will &
Grace" types to live ostensibly "liberated" - and fucking
privileged - lifestyles, for the rest of us day-to-day life as a queer
in Aotearoa still means bashings, harassment and bigotry.
We're
not going to convince an intolerant society to tolerate us by being
politely silent, politely passive. It's time for us to bash back. The
next time the Christian Right try to spread their vicious anti-queer
trash in our city we're going to be there, closing their meeting down.
And as socialists, we don't think it's good enough for only our queer
members to be involved in the struggle against homophobia. We in the
International Socialists expect all our members, queer or straight,
women or men, to get militant and angry in the campaign to eradicate
homophobia from the face of the earth!
History
has shown that we're at our most effective when all people oppressed by
the capitalist class have come together, be they workers, women, queers,
or people who are a combination of all three. For instance, in 1978 the
first Gay Pride march in Sydney was attacked by police outside a
building site. The builders' labourers rushed to the defence of the
queers by turning the hoses used for concrete pours onto the police.
Builders' labourers are not a group that most people would expect to
have liberal attitudes towards homosexuality, but in New South Wales in
the 1970s they were riding a wave of militancy that had turned them from
people popularly presented as stupid into a well paid and powerful
section of workers. They had won improved conditions for themselves and
had gained the confidence to exert their new found industrial strength
over broader social questions.
To
rebuild this kind of attitude today demands a true understanding of the
nature of the struggle and society, and requires us all to recognise
that in the end there's really only one solution - the self emancipation
of all oppressed workers, and the creation of a truly classless world.
To end the persecution, we need to make the homophobes afraid. Don't get
hurt, get organised!
|
Login



